"73 Day"

This was the date in 2001 that Barry Bonds belted his 73rd home run of the season, establishing a new single-season record. (It came off Dennis Springer of the Dodgers.)
But is that really the number you or most fans identify with? Doesn't Roger Maris' 61 still ring truer?
While the MLB hierarchy has never objected to Bonds' puffed up single-season or career totals, we have a right to be skeptical about their legitmacy or credibility.
Yes, Bonds and 73 are officially in the record books. Still, I retain the right to place a personal asterisk next to that entry and instead, honor the achievement of Roger Maris.
Where do you stand on Bonds? Feel free to comment at the bottom of today's page.

Comments

Jahn Ghalt said…
As I commented on Ken Levine's blog last week, my hall-of-fame votes would include Bonds the Younger and others:

Pete Rose
Clemens, (along with Bonds HoF-worthy BEFORE the juice - and never mind innuendo/speculation about when THAT started)
McGwire ("andro" was "legal" as was the stuff Can-choko outed him on)

In four years - A-Rod
In five years - Big Papi

I do remember wandering around at Scottsdale Stadium when Bonds was still a Giant. Tee Shirts worn by various unworthies* stating:

73*

*I know I swim against a tsunami but I disapprove of various forms of unsuitable fan-expressions of "loyalty":

"Bobbleheads" - those seem disrespectful
Jerseys with number and superstar name. Which of us a worthy of the name? At most give me a "24" without the "Mays".

Popular posts from this blog

Rare Remnant of a Lost Ballpark

Will He Wear Zero in the Bronx?

Spring Training Flashbacks: Subway Series, Florida Style - 2016